|
Why I don't use check chains and
why they are not used in any of my classes
The short answer
is that I believe they can physically harm the dog
and that they reflect an out of date approach
to training.
The long answer...
Physical damage
There isn't a lot
of strong medical evidence that check chains cause
damage to dogs, but there is some.
Vets will tell you they
encounter disc and neck problems which they believe
to be a result of dogs being corrected on check
chains. Respected veterinary behaviourist Robin Walker wrote a
strong letter to the
Veterinary Record (Veterinary
Record March 19th 1994 p312) in which he makes clear his professional
opinion that check chains are damaging and dangerous."In
30 years of practice (including 22 years as veterinary
adviser to a police dog section)" he says "
I have seen numerous severely sprained necks, cses
of fainting, transient foreleg paresis, and hindleg
ataxia after robust use of the check chain."
He has more to say about the use of punishment,
period, in training. "It fails disastrously
when it creates anxious casualties or violently
defiant rebels." (op cit)
Swedish vet, Anders
Hallgren (Animal
Behavior Vol 9 No 3 July 1992)
found that 63% of dogs ("ordinary dogs that
owners presented without any suspicion of spinal
anomolies") in a study he carried out in 1992
had spinal anomolies. 55% of them also had some
form of problematic behaviour. Of those that exhibited
overactivity and aggression, 78% had spinal anomolies.
It is a scary figure. Dogs that experience pain
are very likely to show aggression. Of those dogs
which showed anomolies in the cervical region (the
neck) a whopping 91% had been subjected to corrections
on a check chain or had along history of pulling
on the lead. He, like many others, criticise the
use of check chains and training methods which use
jerking and pulling on the lead as way of controlling
a dog.
A small study from New Zealand has xray evidence for changes
on the cervical vertebrae in just a few dogs that wore check
chains. There are reputedly a couple of German studies
but they are difficult to track down and seem
to fall into the 'urban myth' category (unless you
know otherwise?).
But it seems reasonable
to assume that a metal chain placed around a dog's
neck and used to jerk the dog's neck as it lunges
forward is likely to cause some trauma
at some point. The cervical vertebrae aren't designed
to take that kind of punishment. The trachea is not very well protected
so the spine and trachea can both end up damaged.
Some check chain users suggest
you can avoid that possibility by placing the chain
up high behind the ears. Apparently the soft tissue
'cushions' the damage. This suggests that 'soft
tissue' is less easily damaged than muscle over
bone. I'm no vet, but that doesn't convince me much.
Also, if it is up around the ears, and tight under
the throat, there is a danger
it will restrict the blood and air supply to the
brain. One vet has reported to me that she witnessed
a GSD at a breed show collapse in the ring. In her professional
opinion it
was due to the fine check chain pulled up tight
just behind the ears.
Even when I used
check chains for training (which I did for 15/20
years) we recognised the potential for damage. We didn't allow pups under 6 months in a class because
we felt a check chain on a dog any younger was inappropriate.
Why 6 months was chosen as the appropriate age
I really don't know! The bones and muscle don't
reach their full strength for some time after that.
And of course now we do have other ways to
train, and safer and kinder equipment to control
the dog before it is trained, so there is really
no good reason for using them.
Negative training
Check chains are
designed to stop a dog pulling or lunging on
the lead. Either through punishment (by punishing
pulling by swiftly checking back with a sharp check) or by negative reinforcement (by keeping
the chain tight around the dog's neck or up behind the
ears and only releasing it when the dog 'behaves').
They rely on the dog wanting to avoid the unpleasantness
(or even pain) of that potentially harmful
chain around the neck. Used 'correctly' with an
'expert' trainer that unpleasantness
is reduced to a minimum, but even used 'correctly'
they still exert pressure on the neck and throat.
In my experience most
owners (and even dog trainers) have poor timing
generally.
But spotting the right moment to 'correct'
the dog requires excellent timing. When to jerk the lead, and when to release it
requires expertise and skill. The
technique that is usually recommended is that when
the dog forges ahead and tightens the lead, the
handler allows their hands (and therefore the lead)
to go forwards, so the chain slackens momentarily.
As that happens, the quick flick or check is intended to 'correct'
the dog for that forward pulling.
The better trainers then suggest a few words of praise afterwards, and those
words
are considered sufficient
'reward' for the dog landing back next to the handler's
leg.
It is significant that the check on the chain
happens immediately after the lead is slackened.
A loose lead actually can become a signal to the
dog that he is about to have his head jerked off. So from
the dog's point of view any moment the leads goes
slack is a highly dangerous thing to have happen,
and its not unusual to observe dogs trained on a check
chain to try and take up any slack in the lead by
putting their weight into the chain. No doubt a
tight check chain is more comfortable than being
jerked hard.
But
however the check chain is used, or whatever technique
is used, while an inexpert handler gets the hang of how
and when to jerk the dog, the dog is on the receiving
end of their ineptitude and poor timing.
Why is the dog
pulling
on the lead anyway?
Using a check chain
to correct pulling does not
take into account why the dog is pulling.
If a dog is pulling to avoid another dog (because
he is scared) a handler jerking and checking and
insisting on obedience can be doing irreparable mental
harm.
I meet dogs all the time that have been showing
fear aggression towards other dogs who had then
been forced to walk to heel amongst other dogs,
usually in a class environment. Their fear and therefore
their aggression, has increased as consequence.
The owner may have much better superficial control
(with a tight check chain around the dog's ears
perhaps), but the dog is often looking for any opportunity
to escape, or show aggression. Barking, screaming,
hyperactive behaviour; punished consistently, without
addressing the reason for the fear all too often
leads to depressed, submissive behaviour, with
the appearance of being 'obedient', if an
owner is resilient enough to persist.
Sometimes dogs pull
to end a difficult walk more quickly. Those are
the ones that pull more on the way home than on
the way out!
Sometimes dog pull
because they are aroused and stressed and one of
the symptoms of stress is hyperactivity. Combined
with poor training and incorrect learning it is
all too easy to have a dog that wants to pull.
Sometimes dogs pull
because their owners allow it and so the
dog is rewarded for pulling. Because the dog reaches
where it is going and it wants to be there.
Sometimes dogs pull
because they are excited and happy.
Sometimes the dog
has simply not been taught to walk on a loose lead.
Often the dog has no idea whatsoever what is required
of him, because no one has actually tried to communicate
that information to the dog!
Why would harsh
corrections be appropriate in any of those
situations? Teaching the dog how to walk on
a loose lead through positive reinforcement
(rewards) and the witholding
of those rewards (technically speaking negative
punishment) if he goes wrong, is a far kinder
way
to deal with a pulling dog.
Whether check chains
are used 'correctly' or incorrectly they are still
potentially harmful. They are 100% negative training tools. Their sole purpose is
to be unpleasant. They are one of the few pieces
of dog training equipment in common use designed specifically
to cause discomfort and/or pain. There are others,
but most are expensive and reasonably difficult
to obtain. Yet check chains are sold in most pet
shops without instructions and without any health
warnings!
Verbal praise
and rewards
Fortunately (for
the dog) some trainers also use rewards. They
do use some play rewards as well as check
chains for instance. But for many trainers who use
corrections verbal praise is seen as sufficent
reward. Which simply signals 'well done! You
just avoided a correction!'. Not, as it should,
'Well done! You got something right and here's your
reward!'' Dogs are very astute about
wanting to avoid corrections and punishments (ince
they understand how to) so it can produce a
dog that complies, which sadly, reinforces
the handler's willingness to continue using a chack
chain.
But it is telling that there are lot of "trained"
adult dogs around being walked about on check chains.
The message to take from that is that they don't
work very effectively since the dog hasn't learned
to walk on a loose lead without one. Sadly the Kennel
Club don't seem to see
this and permit their us in their Good Citizen tests.
They won't accept the use of a
headcollar in their tests though on the grounds
that if the
handler needs one on the dog is not yet trained
to a high enough standard to pass the tests. But
they continue to view
the check chain as acceptable. Surely if the dog is 'trained'
why should it need one? The same argument they use
to disallow headcollars and harnesses surely also
applies to check chains?
Do corrections
on a check chain work?
From a scientific
point of view punishment reduces or weakens a
behaviour, although there are potential dangers
in using it. But most dog trainers who use
check chains seem not to be using them from any
good understanding
either of operant conditioning (ie how the dog changes
his behaviour in response to the consequences
of his behaviour) or of the potential fallout from
using it. Hence the rather crude
way a lot of heaving, restraining and checking
carried out
without any real understanding if why it might
work and why it doesn't and why using positive reinforcement
would be more effective and a more constructive
way to train.
Often it is seen as way
of showing the dog who is boss. Showing the dog
that you, the handler, is stronger and more assertive.
It is used to signify something more that just 'stop
pulling'. It is that combative, confrontational
view of the relationship between dog and handler
that epitomises all that is viewed as out of date
and harmful about the more traditional approaches
to dog training. The
underlying idea is the dog is trying to gain physical
superiority and needs to know who is 'boss'. No doubt it stems
from the ideas about a dog that is leading the way
is 'dominant' and trying to be the 'pack leader',
but in reality there is no evidence that this is
the case.
The dog/owner
relationship
Any technique or
training tool which relies on a trainer constantly
focusing on, and punishing, moments the dog is incorrect
and getting things wrong is very damaging to the
partnership. Instead of handler and dog working
together as a team, with the dog choosing to
stay with the owner because it wants to, its about the trainer 'criticising'
the dog for getting things wrong. Why on earth would
a dog want to stay with a person who
constantly nags and corrects it? But dogs being
dogs, they (mostly) learn to cope. Dogs are very
adaptable!
Conclusion
Check chains may
have been the preferred training tool 30/40 years
ago but we didn't know much, if anything, about
operant conditioning then. We know better now. There
is evidence of physical harm. The
literature and the expertise is out there on kinder,
more effective techniques so there
is no excuse for using outdated and damaging methods.
Using a check chain may tell the dog something about
what isn't wanted, but little about what
is. It focuses on very damaging aspects of the training
equation (punishment or negative reinforcement), and the part that does the
most damage. Criticising the dog's efforts;
using pain and discomfort in an attempt to force
compliance from our dogs is just not acceptable.
As a training tool the check chain is crude,
outdated and unnecessary.
|